The BBC Versus The Murdochs

James Murdoch - I don't care what you think about the BBC, James

The debate surrounding the BBC is a complex one; this is largely owing to the corporation’s history and dominance of UK broadcasting.  One must also take into account the BBC’s structure, which more closely resembles the civil-service than a commercial enterprise – albeit with some ‘modernisation’.

Most governmental criticism directed at the BBC during New Labour was aimed at the high salaries paid to stars like Jonathan Ross and senior executives.  The former can be explained by a mixture of petty jealousy and a total failure to grasp the concept of market-forces in the entertainment industry (although I do accept that many ‘stars’ are greedy).  The latter issue is more complicated.  The BBC defend it by claiming that they need to do this to attract business-sector experts who bring greater efficiency to the service.  Government criticism of this seems rather hypocritical in light of the fact that governments – going back to the early days of Margaret Thatcher – have done similar things.  Both Thatcher and Blair were criticised for surrounding themselves with unelected advisors and they defended themselves by using a very similar excuse.  The new coalition government have continued these criticisms but since it is an overwhelming Tory administration another has been added.

The Tories claim that the BBC has a centre-left bias and have done so for many years.  This claim is odd because I don’t seem to remember the BBC telling the public to vote for a centre-left party during the General Election although I do remember many newspapers and the Murdoch broadcasting empire telling the public to vote Conservative.  Are the Tories equally critical of this bias?  Of course not.  And as per usual, the Tories with their usual mixture of bile, spite and vitriol are proposing the BBC should be privatised – payback for imagined slights, no doubt.

The BBC is important for many reasons.  Foremost among these is the fact that the corporation ensures that a certain level of quality is maintained in British broadcasting; it sets the bar higher than it would be if the BBC didn’t exist.  For instance, quality television abroad – for example the US’s HBO – is strictly pay-per-view.  The BBC provides also provides a service that isn’t reliant on the support of advertisers, who are motivated by profit and nothing else.  This ensures that more specialist programmes and innovative formats can be supported.  In addition, we have the issue of the BBC’s news coverage – this has long been envied all over the world and it is not driven by commercial interests.  Okay, I have my criticisms of it; did we really need hours upon hours of the hunt for Raoul Moat, for example?  I felt that was rather excessive and morbid, but they usually strike the right balance.  Even the BBC’s sports coverage is regarded as the best – even I know that and I’m not even a sports fan.

In his McTaggart lecture, a year ago James Murdoch was very critical of the BBC, but why is anybody listening to him anyway?  James Murdoch is clearly so partisan in his criticisms that his arguments lack all credibility.  Furthermore, Murdoch Senior has already dragged British print media into the gutter – do we really need Murdoch Junior to do that with the rest of it?  The BBC clearly has less of a monopoly than it used to have; there are far more channels on television than ever before, and the Murdoch’s have clearly a lot more money available to them than the BBC.  A Murdoch monopoly is demonstrably worse than that of the BBC, whose monopoly can only be said to be in radio now.  The BBC’s Director General, Mark Thompson may have over-egged his lecture last week, but I’m on his side in this instance.  The Murdochs are abhorrent.


6 thoughts on “The BBC Versus The Murdochs

  1. Every year, on the morning of the 10th of June, BBC Radio 4 plays the National Anthem as a tribute to an elderly man of distinctly conservative tendencies, who happens to be married to the queen. Precisely what sort of “left-leaning” organisation would do such a thing? For that matter, what sort of “left-leaning” organisation would employ Andrew Neil, Jeremy Clarkson or Nick Robinson (a former president of the Oxford University Conservative Association)?

  2. Very good points Tim and well made.

  3. There was a website brought into play some one year before the election that did a daily analysis and diagnosis of the bias in the BBC. It clearly showed that the BBC spent more time with Labour than either of the other two parties by a considerable amount. Also it was more aggressive and with far more interruptions in interviews with the Conservative Party.
    This website stopped operations after the election as one man worked it and he needed to get his life back – he was named Craig, and did valuable service to Britain.
    Radio 4 is a hotbed of bias toward Labour and the BBC has been noted as being Blair’s Broadcasting Corp, later Brown’s, and now probably Bolshevik if Balls does not become leader.
    This is also why radio 4 “Today Programme” has for years been dubbed the Toady Programme.
    Since Labour lost the election there has been a lessening of bias on radio 4 but this is only interim until the Labour Party choose a leader – no person lost his or her job in BBC in spite of many complaints made about them.
    The BBC is publicly funded, and therefore should work to its mandate in offering news that is balanced, unbiased, and truthful.
    It has not done this for many years, and is a pale imitation of what it was 30 years ago, as well as being a bloated bureaucracy led by self seeking neophytes. Listen to editors arrogance on the Radio 4 Feedback programme to get a small taste of this.
    I have only listened to a BBC soundbite of Thompson’s Edinburgh speech, and hopefully will get the full version this week. Initial soundings are that as normal with his speeches it was not very good, very short on content as to the direction he is taking the BBC, and much longer on how he believes Murdoch should operate his empire.

  4. Cassandrina,

    What a beautiful name but I disagree with you completely!

    I’m a Tory and I just do not go along with your suggestions of bias at all.

    There is not a more evenly balanced or fair broadcaster or news organisation anywhere in the world.

  5. Thank the lord you said that Peter, because if I’d said it I’d have been accused of being unable to detect a leftist bias because I’m left-wing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s