The Conservatives’ Thoroughly Bizarre Campaign

david cameronI’m not a fan of the Tories.  I thoroughly hate them if I’m being honest.  I can’t understand why anybody would vote for them, unless they are among the most fabulously wealthy and don’t happen to care about anybody else.

However, I can usually I can understand the thinking behind a Conservative Party General Election Campaign.  They’re usually extremely adept at them; they naturally appeal to people’s greed, need to feel superior to others and the general fear the British people have of everybody else.  They also highly attuned to Little England and its fundamental loathe of change and the unknown.  All of this is because these are kinds of people in the Conservative Party itself and they usually the ones running it, or at least know how to access the right people to run its advertising division.

This current campaign is a weird one and it’s coming unglued very rapidly.  I think this is for numerous reasons:

1) The Conservative Party is extremely spiteful.  I should back up that statement just in case you think I’m saying it purely out of my biased point of view but just check out how the Coalition’s cuts hit Labour-run councils the hardest, resulting in greater job losses. The party’s nasty streak has been even more visible since the Labour Party elected Ed Miliband as its leader; he has been portrayed by the Tories and their media cronies as ‘weird’, ‘red Ed’, not being able to speak properly, looking like a cartoon character, looking awkward and – most bizarrely – as being unable to eat a bacon-sandwich correctly.  Some of the remarks have even come across as vaguely anti-Semitic.  However, this is now resulting in a backlash; as people have got to know Ed Miliband better they have started to realise much of this derision was undeserved and that it was tantamount to bullying.  The Tories made the fateful error of not only underestimating Miliband but also lowering people’s expectations to the point that if he didn’t come across as some sort of alien life-form they’d feel the urge to be impressed.

2) The Leaders’ Debates were something David Cameron made a great deal out of during the General Election of 2010, trumpeting that they had a vital role to play in British democracy.  However, this time he not only seems to have changed his mind but developed a physical aversion to them.  He put his foot down and said that he would only attend one on the condition that all of the party leaders were present and would definitely not be willing to do a head-to-head debate with Ed Miliband.  He backed himself into a corner by insisting on this, since if he was persuaded to change his mind he would appear indecisive, but by refusing he would come across as cowardly, stubborn and unable to defend his record.  Cameron did one debate with the other party leaders and found himself outnumbered by all of them accusing his government of going too far with the cuts, too soon.  We have been used to witnessing Cameron’s bully-boy tactics during Prime Minister’s Questions but there was no way that such an approach was going to win him any admiration in this kind of forum, but he resorted to them anyway.

3) Some of the Tories’ campaign has been almost beyond parody.  This week they made an attempt to rebrand themselves as the party of working-class people in the Northern England.  This is the same North that fell prey to Margaret Thatcher’s epic industrial savagery during the 1980s, consequent inter-generational unemployment and been prey to greater cuts and austerity during the current coalition.  Oddly the people of the North proved resistant to this idea. Did the Tories imagine that they could get away with this rebranding? Maybe they thought that it would cause some form of cognitive dissonance and people would get confused by it?  Who knows?  It doesn’t look like it has worked though.

4) Cameron’s refusal to take part in the Leader’s Debates has had another unexpected effect.  The media, who would have benefitted from the PM appearing on them, seems to have become royally pissed off with him.  His interviews ever since the whole debacle have become noticeable tougher and Cameron has been unable to deal with the situation, becoming petulant and childish when asked an awkward question.  This is not really the sort of performance that people want from their Prime Minister – certainly not one who likes to pretend he is an Alpha Male anyway.

5) For some reason the Conservative Party have brought back John Major.  I think we can all agree that isn’t a great idea.  As Labour’s John Smith said back when John Major was PM, Major was so unpopular that if he was an undertaker people would stop dying.

6)  The Conservative appear to have developed an obsession with the SNP.  Their current line is that if one votes Labour, one will get the SNP in charge instead.  It’s difficult to understand the thinking that underpins this; do they imagine that a vote for Labour will result in angry, face-painted Scots invading England to force-feed us all deep-fried Mars Bars, or is it just more of that patented Tory xenophobia we’re all used to hearing?  Either way it all appears very silly, particularly coming from a man with the surname Cameron.

Nick Clegg – Politician or Aberration

This blog was prompted by the defection of Liverpool Councillor Ian Jobling’s defection to the Labour Party.

It is quite possible that Nick Clegg has single-handedly destroyed the Liberal Democrats.  During the General Election campaign, he was seen in three separate televised leadership debates promoting centre-left policies while soulfully gazing down the camera-lens in the manner an X-Factor contestant.  What has happened to those policies?  They’re all gone.  He is now propping up a very right-wing Conservative administration and not only seems content to do so but actually seems to be relishing it.  I can accept that people’s views can change, but not about everything in a matter of days.

No matter how one looks at Nick Clegg, it seems that he is an outrageous opportunist and liar.  This is a man who will do anything for self-advancement, even if it means betraying the very people who elected him as party-leader and who voted for him during the General Election.  It was generally agreed that Clegg came across well during the leadership debates and the policies he was espousing were for the most part popular, even if his personal high approval-rating didn’t translate into votes.  So how do the people who thought so much of him during the General Election feel about him now?  Judging by the polls (if they can be trusted) they certainly don’t rate him anymore.   

The Liberal Democrats famously have their origins in the anti-absolutist Whigs who were a major force in UK politics from the 1680s to the 1850s, which is when the party changed its name to the Liberal Party.   The rest is history, as they say.  That is how old the party is and how crucial its role it has been in British history; it’s not a philosophy I personally subscribe to but I do think it deserves some measure of respect.  

What of Nick Clegg’s history?  Well, we know he originally began his political journey as a Conservative party member until switching his allegiance to the Liberal Democrats.  Judging by his behaviour now, his views didn’t change all that much when he changed parties – perhaps he felt that he’d have better chance of becoming leader of the smaller Liberal Democrat party.  Of course, that is strictly speculation on my part.

I’m not naïve.  I know that politicians are careerists.  However, I would like to think that they have some ideals and that they believe in what they are saying, if not what is the point?  Despite being from the left, I can have friendly discussions with Tories and Liberal Democrats without it descending into a slanging match.  Politicians like Nick Clegg, however, really annoy me.  He is the very worst kind – he has sacrificed his entire party on the altar of his personal aggrandisement.  There would be no point in debating anything with people like him; his views seem to change depending on who is listening to them.  This is a man who would support any policy if it meant he could advance his career.

Can the Liberal Democrats survive the infamy that Nick Clegg is bringing to the party?  Perhaps it can – it is a very old party after all, and it has survived worse.  If I was a Liberal Democrat, I would seriously think about sacking him though.  And soon.

For more Nick Cleggery here is a link to an excellent new blogger, Lisa Marie Miller – http://networkedblogs.com/79zmt